Samuel Jr's death notice appeared in 16 July,1741 edition of a
Philadelphia newspaper datelined New Jersey.
biographical sketch in the "1911 History of Morrow County"
John II went to Long Island and there purchased land of the Indians, near Newton, Queen's county, Long Island, in 1662
--------------------------
given in the book "Denman-Frisinger and Allied Familes" by Betty Pond Snyder, copyright 1887. Joseph is on page 34. He was son of William Denman 1747-1819 and Prudence Bedford (d 1836). William was a son of Philip Denman (b 1704) and Sarah Crane, p 32. Philip was a son of John Denman and Mary Gano, p 30. John was a son of John Denman b 1621 England, p 29. John was a son of John Denman and Judith Stoughton, p 27.
Be aware that there are some mistakes in this book. What was written in the 1911 History of Morrow County is in agreement with the above mentioned book, with the exception of William, son of John Denman and Mary Gano/Gannaugh. That book says William married first Lydia, then Abby.
One more sacred cow which is wrong -- John Denman (d. 1713 at Newtown, LI), Judith's grandson or great-grandson, did NOT marry Mary GANO, the daughter of Francis Gano. His wife was Mary, probably a sister of Jeremiah Gannugh, a family not connected to the Rev. Francis Gano family. Mark Denman
BIOGRAPHY: From Charles Hendrick, p. 65, 66: Abraham was apparently bound out by his mother as an apprentice. From an ad printed in the "New York Gazette"August 25, 1735: In the month of December last an Apprentise Lad named Abraham Hendricks ran away from his Master, John Ross, of Elizabeth Town,New Jersey; said Lad is about 19 years of age, was small of stature, hada brown great Coat and a Linsey Woolsey under a Beaver Hat, half worn,having light colored hair and took a set of Shoemaker's Tools along withhim, being a Shoemaker by Trade. Whoever shall take up said Apprentiseand convey him to his Master, or secure him and give Notice so that his Master ca have him again, shall have Thirty Shllings as a reward and allreasonble Charges." It is not known whether or not he was returned to his master, but in 1743 his name appears among a large number of citizens attched to a memorial forwarded to King George II.